Andreas Urstadt

Fingers don't have second hands. Here the letters sit around, they form a few different words or leave it alone. There. There was nothing there. Where might they have gone? They hang around here informally. Stand together carelessly. Come here to show off your leisure time. Some you rarely or never see together. They don't pay attention to their languages here. Some people make long-distance calls or send each other something with foreign translations (there are completely different letters for the word apple, they also walk around there with their feet in the air). The Vietnamese appear elegantly, they are Vietnameseized and look French (but put the words in a completely different way, see above) as they walk around individually. The two of them left together. Andreas Urstadt and Tatiana Nikolaevna Romanova appeared like the water, with their hands pressed under their butts, helped them through the spring. For 2 years research (from 2022) in the worst area of ​​Germany, of all municipalities the municipality is in last place. People, you notice this in everyday life, in that the official bodies from the Kusel city library to the adult education center, etc. do not answer inquiries. The work gets blocked from the official bodies. More or less, it is sometimes the same as Bad Day at Black Rock or the same as Inherit the wind. I immediately thought it could be the same as Lambarene - which it was not, it was immediately Bad Day at Black Rock or Inherit the wind. Why they are at the very end quickly became clear. The contrast to this were the same inquiries to other places, all of which responded helpfully. If books would change anything, I would have concentrated on the books. What I do in addition to a few books, over 2000 pages of research logbook have been written in the last two years (2023/2024) (Snufflescience). Don t get depressed by the report, there s overwhelming feeback from the outside. May work focuses on "ethical infrastructures" and development and innovation (which is always social and environmentally friendly, otherwise it is not). A number of books are always semi-scientific. Often complex (not complicated) and not linear. Many of the books were originally written in English. In many cases, books are currently not available simply because of image rights, as the books in question contain images in the public domain. Kindle is unable to explain why some books with public domain images are allowed and others are not. The argument is with internal regulations, since around 200 titles are affected by, this has to be mentioned here. *** The author's books that are displayed with priority by Amazon are created solely from algorithms and have nothing to do with the author's focus, because these books are not displayed with priority at all. The really interested readers should start with the book "Chanmony", which no one has done since 2014. The book has never had voluntary readers. This applies to a whole lot more books. After all, books like "Trinh T. Min-ha" had a whole range of readers worldwide, the algorithm doesn't react at all to rare names. The algorithms react to mass. For example, a book that has no buyers at all is shown as particularly popular. *** OLDER: From RESEARCH: The more unknown an author is and the more daring, the less good the reviews are. The well-known writer is allowed to take risks, the unknown one is not. WHY IS THIS: The reader does not know the professional rating of an author, experts do not care about an author's reputation (this author has received very good reviews from all experts). SO WHY THIS: Every new book someone reads creates stress in the reader, the reader takes uncertain paths. The reader's body requires more energy when reading the book. BUT, WHEN the reader looks at or immerses himself in a book by a well-known author, that knowledge already puts the reader at ease. So the reader doesn't need the same amount of energy when reading the book. This phenomenon is called “herding”. The herd arises around an already well-known writer. “Herding” always arises in the fields or a field of uncertainty. So, the ordinary reader prefers to close a book by an unknown author, this prevents the reader from being stressed by what is written, requiring more energy. It is better for the condition of the ordinary reader to shift the stress onto the unknown writer. The reader doesn't question himself. Evolution only follows one path to reduce stress and the amount of energy required within a species. The difficult is thus eliminated, unknown writers remain unknown. ................................... But here we have to move to another level. The unusual reader. Virginia Woolf, Samuel Beckett etc. would have remained unrecognized if unusual readers had not discovered them. (This author had unusual readers, but the unusual readers did not see the work under the author's name). Unsettled (you can also say, unsettled) readers read differently, they are genuinely curious about uncertainty and unknown paths, they are pioneers. If everyone says no, they say yes - if everyone says no, can't you leave the ocean and live on land? - they don't answer, they just do it. They innovate, they refresh life. They escape the stress in the waters full of enemies - there are no enemies on land and so life on land reduces the stress and reduces the energy required. It is still important to reduce energy requirements, and evolution is still going on like this, but pioneers are unusual (the automatic translation, the original was written in English, even means rare), they are different and find other solutions. The same goes for reading books, how to read books. Especially when authors in a positive sense deviate far from the common norm there may be readers who can t cope with. contradiction is dao s flow weakness is dao s walkability not honoring the worthy prevents people from strife Laozi OLD EPIC VERSION: What s an anecdote? What forced me slowly to buy and read all books by Sam Shepard had been (slowly means like a beginning avalanche and I bought all of his books in a rush) the incidents around him, put him into a room, lock the room and don t let him out til he has written a complete work from scratch - I did it not much later myself and didn t need a locked room and no one who let me out. Anything else the same, ok, so I shipped my work to the Royal Court Theatre London (I had no hopes cos like Sam Shepard I send it the way it had been written in one go), "strong", "sophisticated" etc. had been the feedback from the Royal Court (and the Soho etc) and all times for over 140 pages in one go. Ok, I thought and forgot that I am not a native English speaker. I didn t took this into account. Did I top Sam Shepard? I gave no thought about vertical thinking and stratification, when you re working the mentioned way, you re horizonal, not vertical. And then? What then? I just wanted feedback and I got the feedback. I hadn t plan anything. So I became writer with a horizonal way without thinking about any consequences, I even had a serious - german - publisher - and the serious known publisher came with an edition plan, it would have taken years for publishing my work, ... that had been one way for getting to createspace. Createspace is more a prairie than a salon. I never thought about salons or typical writer s matters. But there s not only Sam Shepard, there s also Nathalie Sarraute. She also didn t think on salons. You can only write when you have something to say. To show. To explain. A horizon. April 15, 2016