Andreas Urstadt

关于作者

Hi! Fingers don't have second hands. Here the letters sit around, they form a few different words or leave it alone. There. There was nothing there. Where might they have gone? They hang around here informally. Stand together carelessly. Come here to show off your leisure time. Some you rarely or never see together. They don't pay attention to their languages here. Some people make long-distance calls or send each other something with foreign translations (there are completely different letters for the word apple, they also walk around there with their feet in the air). The Vietnamese appear elegantly, they are Vietnameseized and look French (but put the words in a completely different way, see above) as they walk around individually. The two of them left together. Andreas Urstadt and Tatiana Nikolaevna Romanova appeared like the water, with their hands pressed under their butts, helped them through the spring. May work focuses on "ethical infrastructures" and development and innovation (which is always social and environmentally friendly, otherwise it is not). A number of books are always semi-scientific. Often complex (not complicated) and not linear. Many of the books were originally written in English. Democracy. Developing / building up / organizing Raissa + Michail Gorbachev School (university anticipated) So, if you've got this far, it's actually a different story. The Raissa + Mikhail Gorbachev School has already been founded virtually. It's aimed at everyone from 6 years old to infinity, which means that professors can also learn something. The school is also a research station. The transition to university level is fluid. Recognized qualifications cannot (yet) be obtained - the skills to be learned are supposed to go beyond any formal qualification. That's beyond the scope, but it's hinted at in the book Die Ethik des Pferdes. There's also evolutionary biology, cultural ethology, etc. part of the school. *** The author's books that are displayed with priority by Amazon are created solely from algorithms and have nothing to do with the author's focus, because these books are not displayed with priority at all. The really interested readers should start with the book "Chanmony", which no one has done since 2014. The book has never had voluntary readers. This applies to a whole lot more books. After all, books like "Trinh T. Min-ha" had a whole range of readers worldwide, the algorithm doesn't react at all to rare names. The algorithms react to mass. For example, a book that has no buyers at all is shown as particularly popular. "Chanmony" is just a fugue around the hell of Pol Pot - without Pol Pot at all. There´s another one called "Viêtnaut" - both should have been long translated to English. *** Music is important and so music ran while some books emerged - Phoenix Mundy (Patchwork Guilt), Joe Dassin, Baron, Sailor, Pizzicato Five, Joe Strummer, Madness, DDT (Yuri Shevchuk), Vladimir Vysotsky, Karel Kryl, Chumbawamba, William Shatner, Feng FeiFei, Franco Battiato, Leo Ferré, Sakamoto, The Claypool Lennon Delirium, Saqi, The KLF, Greenland Whalefisheries, Yoko Ono, Tri Atma, Pernell Roberts, 3 Mustaphas 3, Ros Sereysothea, Flash and the Pan, Karlheinz Stockhausen contradiction is dao s flow weakness is dao s walkability not honoring the worthy prevents people from strife Laozi OLD EPIC VERSION: STONE AGE What s an anecdote? What forced me slowly to buy and read all books by Sam Shepard had been (slowly means like a beginning avalanche and I bought all of his books in a rush) the incidents around him, put him into a room, lock the room and don t let him out til he has written a complete work from scratch - I did it not much later myself and didn t need a locked room and no one who let me out. Anything else the same, ok, so I shipped my work to the Royal Court Theatre London (I had no hopes cos like Sam Shepard I send it the way it had been written in one go), "strong", "sophisticated" etc. had been the feedback from the Royal Court (and the Soho etc) and all times for over 140 pages in one go. Ok, I thought and forgot that I am not a native English speaker. I didn t took this into account. Did I top Sam Shepard? I gave no thought about vertical thinking and stratification, when you re working the mentioned way, you re horizonal, not vertical. And then? What then? I just wanted feedback and I got the feedback. I hadn t plan anything. So I became writer with a horizonal way without thinking about any consequences, I even had a serious - german - publisher - and the serious known publisher came with an edition plan, it would have taken years for publishing my work, ... that had been one way for getting to createspace. Createspace is more a prairie than a salon. I never thought about salons or typical writer s matters. But there s not only Sam Shepard, there s also Nathalie Sarraute. She also didn t think on salons. You can only write when you have something to say. To show. To explain. A horizon. April 15, 2016

阅读完整简历

书籍

我们找不到与这些筛选器相匹配的内容