Dean Clarke

Dean Clarke has a College Degree in Arts and Sciences of Liberal Studies Bachelor in Art History, Geography and Astronomy. He wrote book Archaeo-Astronometria which is the book where he made the prediction that in a region of South Eastern Turkey would be found one region of the origins of advanced astronomy or astrology introduced from another region prior this was later proven at Gobekli Tepe, Anatolia being over 13,000 years old with exact symbol of Scorpio outline. He has written on Egyptian Ancient History and various formats of thinking about influence of even pre-dynastic Egypt in Europe and North America as well as in Dynastic Periods of Egypt religious thought and practices in a tentative view of diffusion of culture; presented as more times than not, in a 'cultural delay' in patterns of introduction compared to the origin start of practices of different religious and superstitious beliefs of ancient man. Clarke uses different examples at times related and unrelated to the process of diffusion to show the existences of certain lines of ancient thinking to look at prior cultures as leaving at times their very subtle practices and references. In some cases subjects that have been studied by other scholars independent of diffusion of culture ideas but at the same time their own subject study went unnoticed in a wider sense to study other systems with as compared to a world wide perspective of time lines compared to similar practices or ideas of ancient man that has its own hallmark of earliest usage or firsts of style. The language at times Clarke focuses on but he does so in a very hesitant way with place names which he himself admits is not full proof or the end of story about the subject of why traditions would over lap a early cultures words of tribes or habitations influenced at times by colonization and trade attempts. In this way Dean Clarke is a kind of Barry Fells of patterns in place names explanations at times in context to its present words lost in time but later placed in aggregate terms often found to be of unknown origins of words. Sometimes the words do not even exist in the local tribal languages before the advent of early colonial explorers in America and after Christopher Columbus. His interdisciplinary approach is not only recognized but appreciated by the main view of scientists of culture that it would in fact take more than one level of awareness about various aspects of cultural study to prove one diffusion proof or point if not archaeology the available evidence along with the study which Clarke points out at times. Subjects of Cultural Study when separated as a study; so to speak, does not directly combine the studies found with examples or easily discovered origins when it is isolated from various countries own views of systems of cultural study. That process has caused conclusions in the past that led to cultural misunderstandings that are usually not warranted since the study is of a age or period long before their own changed cultural identities either indigenous or foreign influenced. It is why diffusion ideas are often played down or considered at times not provable subjects for popular acceptance in science as a kind of pseudo political obstruction of the other truths that are possible that end up not being discussed. Clarke teaches how to avoid the one size fits all approach since the process of augmentation within any culture over space and time can effect how the new cultural change occurs and foreign interaction that was accepted or just faded out as well as their objects of interests just as quickly ends in use when the culture in question fades. Clarke's system of study is unique and is why quickly gaining interests in his teaching of his system that is inspiring a whole new generation of cultural appreciation of the legacies that ancient man gave modern man of very rich traditions long since echo in modern life and expressions. Clarke's work falls in a lost folklorist and lost religious examples that in a very surprising way finds various parallels that other anthropologists might have or not thought only for a brief moment but the thought ended up being keep to themselves either as 'thats impossible discovery' or was 'a hunch' that they were to afraid to mention to their academic groups. Clarke in this way does not have to worry about the subject if it stretches the realm of possibility since he asks the right questions for the reader to consider as the answers he if partly noticed.